Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Third

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14
1
Deck Building / Re: Modified Starter Decks for new players
« on: October 04, 2013, 12:16:03 PM »
Sleepers modified starter deck



Mostly tested against Ai due to low playerbase, but I have been quite happy with its performance considering the base of the Deck is the Starter Deck of Sleepers and a lucky super booster pack.

:) enjoy

2
Deck Building / Re: Modified Starter Decks for new players
« on: October 04, 2013, 11:46:20 AM »
yep.. I really feel bad though, sorry :(

I got to revisit it last night, but I am not completely happy with what I came up with.. I had more rares in the deck I had already created than I thought I had.

It is comming though! =)

3
Deck Building / Re: Modified Starter Decks for new players
« on: October 02, 2013, 12:18:07 PM »
Eta: 1 hour :)

4
Deck Building / Re: Modified Starter Decks for new players
« on: September 30, 2013, 06:41:16 PM »
Will do when I'm off.. EDIT: plans changed sorry, will make it tomorrow :) its now 1AM here and I need sleep.

5
Yes, the game has bugs. Yes, we are aware that it has bugs. This game is, however, still very much in beta. Closed beta to be precise. As these bugs get reported, and the more often they are reported, the higher up on the priority they go and the sooner they end up getting fixed. I'm sorry that happened to you. It would be great if those bugs didn't exist (though the dehumanize making flying demons I do not believe is a bug, and the issue with Nysrugh that was mentioned doesn't seem to be a bug either. Clarification on the text of the cards would be nice, though). However, in order for them to be taken care of, they need to be found and reported. That's the best we, currently as beta testers, can do.

+1

6
General Discussion / Re: Balance - After RISE 9-19-2013
« on: September 19, 2013, 11:21:14 PM »
Zin, I love some of your ideas (and of course I disagree with some).
Going to hold my comments until we see the balance patch.

Please don't the more feedback there is before the balance patch the better :)

7
Just got a PM that you are fixed =)

8
General Game Discussion / Re: Backer Avatars
« on: September 18, 2013, 12:03:48 PM »
Card art > avatars imo

My problem is.. I made a Prince level contribution, and the Prince level contribution is Sleepers (the faction I like the least) and it is not even unique characters.. It is a Fear and Zombie Scavenger....

I had hoped that it would be unique avatars.. And the more you backed the more awesome it would look =) This way your favorite faction might be of the lowest backing level, so using that avatar you are not showing others how much you backed with..

9
General Game Discussion / Re: Backer Avatars
« on: September 18, 2013, 09:44:51 AM »

10
General Game Discussion / Backer Avatars
« on: September 18, 2013, 06:37:04 AM »
Am I the only backer whom had hoped that the avatars would be unique, and not just card art? :(

Just wondering.. I'm a bit disappointed because I had imagined something else entirely.

11
Suggestions / Re: New pack options
« on: September 16, 2013, 08:59:02 PM »
+1000

12
Suggestions / Re: A Thought Regarding Morale
« on: September 15, 2013, 11:40:17 AM »
I think in general the best thing to do is keeping the rules of the game simple, if complexity is needed keep it to the cards =)

13
Suggestions / Re: Priority and competitiveness
« on: September 13, 2013, 09:38:03 AM »
Or just accept that a strong commander can be countered before he is effective by Exile, Warpath and Verore (heck Genesis could even do a Controlled Temporal Anomaly on him turn 3).. Build around it, try not having him as a commander, have 2+ in the deck and play him on the opponents initiative.. you are now 100% sure that you will get his ability off at least once =)

Happy gaming

14
Dammit Ian.. Hire more people already!

15
Suggestions / Re: Dragon of Wisdom/Assasinate - combo or exploit?
« on: September 13, 2013, 09:10:06 AM »
It is indeed intended. 3 Purity decks come at a high price, thus they must have high reward for blocking themselves off from other factions' cards.
If only other 3 purity cards had this mindset.
If only other 3 purity cards had this mindset.
If only other 3 purity cards had this mindset.

Lol, not in the face.

+1

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14